Dr.Marquardt
ENG 1430 W10
Mar.30th
Word Count:#326
Response To The Argument
My partner’s argument is the difference between the character’s attitude towards life. In the traditional Cinderella story, Cinderella is passive to change. Cinderella got the happy ending by magic with other’s help. In fact, she did nothing. But in the film, The heroine tried to study hard to get a opportunity. Maybe others gave her help. she tried to change her life by herself. It’s active for her to change because she made much efforts.
I know what she said is a truth, but in some way I disapprove of her view. Cinderella did do nothing to change, which was a truth. However, she had an intense desire to change, which was essential to her further transformation. If she didn’t want to change, no one could force her to join in the party. Of course, her successful transformation disappeared. Thus, I think it’s she had no competence to do something rather than she wasn’t willing to change. Her stepmother and her two sisters limited her personal freedom and didn’t provide her with beautiful clothes. She had no opportunity to change, so she had to ask for the pigeons for help.
However, in the film, no one limited Liz’s personal freedom. Thus, she could do whatever she wants according to her will. Because her mother died when she was 15 years old and her father entered into the shelter, so no relatives took care of her. Also she has plenty of freedom to change her life. The helpers are also indispensable to her change. If they didn’t supply help to her, then she had no chance to change. I hold the view that though her efforts are important, the help from helpers is important as well.
Consequently, through the analysis of the traditional Cinderella story and the film, the main characters of them are both active to change life. The only difference was that Cinderella had no freedom to change by herself and Liz could.